Now offering wire transfer and ACH payment methods!

Currency News

President defends forces and tells Iraq it can count on U.S.

By Associated Press
April 25, 2006

IRVINE, Calif. - President Bush said the United States has made some missteps in Iraq but that his decision to send in troops to topple Saddam Hussein was the right call.

Other developments:

•A bomb hidden in a minibus exploded near the offices of anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr in eastern Baghdad today, killing two Iraqi civilians and wounding three, police said.

•The bodies of two Iraqi men who apparently had been tortured and killed in captivity were found today in Baghdad.

•Two roadside bombs - one targeting a U.S. military convoy and the other an Iraqi police patrol - exploded in Baghdad, wounding three Iraqis, officials said today.

•A roadside bomb seriously wounded an Iraqi policeman, and a drive-by shooting killed a Kurdish civilian as he was leaving his home in the northern city of Mosul, police said today.

•Political parties met separately in Baghdad's heavily guarded Green Zone on Monday to discuss proposed Cabinet ministers.

"On the big decisions of sending the troops in, I'd have done it again," Bush told a questioner after a speech Monday on immigration.

Bush said a new democracy is arising in Iraq where there once was tyranny. Over the weekend, Bush talked with Iraqi leaders who were named Saturday to form a coalition government.

"Each one of them said: `We want to have a national unity government. We're sick of the sectarian violence. We believe if you stand with us, we can achieve our objective of becoming a democracy that listens to the people,' " Bush said.

"And I believe them. And I believe them. And I told them, I said, `Look, it's going to be up to you to make it work, but you can count on the United States of America, because we believe in liberty and the capacity of liberty to change lives and to change a neighborhood for a more peaceful tomorrow.' "

Reflecting on the U.S. deployment in Iraq, now in its fourth year, Bush said the United States misjudged the internal security threat and mistakenly attempted big reconstruction projects that became a target for insurgents.

"The fundamental question on the Iraq theater, though, is: Did we put enough troops in there in the first place? That's the debate in Washington," he said. "I'm sure you've heard about it."

He said he told now retired Gen. Tommy Franks, who developed and executed the Iraq invasion plan, "You design the plan, and you've got what you need."

Bush's comments Monday were echoed by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, who said Iraq's new leadership provides the best opportunity to rein in rival militia groups blamed for a furious surge in sectarian killings.

Jawad al-Maliki, the Shiite politician selected as Iraq's prime minister Saturday after months of political infighting, is the strongest political figure to emerge since the U.S.-led invasion more than three years ago, she said.

"He comes to this as the strongest political figure really ever . . . since the liberation of Iraq," Rice said.

"He comes with both the imprimatur of the Iraqi people and . . . the mandate to form a unified national unity government."

As for the problem of sectarian violence, Rice said there "the potential for those militias to be an even bigger problem is there."

"But while the problem of the militias is there and perhaps more urgent, it is also true that for the first time the Iraqis actually have a framework in which to deal with those militias," Rice said.

In an interview with the Pentagon's TV channel, whose primary audience is the military at home and abroad, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld called the breakthrough in selecting top political leaders in Baghdad a "thrilling accomplishment."

Rumsfeld said he still expects to be able to reduce the size of the U.S. force in Iraq, but he provided no details and said it would depend on conditions, including further political progress and the state of the insurgency.

Rumsfeld also blasted Iran, saying its radical leaders are part of the challenge facing the world's democracies as they confront terrorism worldwide.

"Their cause is a cause that is dangerous to the world," he said, adding that if the U.S. effort in Iraq failed, that would advance the anti-democratic interests of Iran.

Copyright 2006, The Albuquerque Tribune. All Rights Reserved.

Back to Top